Sections 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of fraud, a pre-arrest arrest using a forged document, a contract to sell the video contract / agreement under the grant of further investigation , Which was executed and signed by any fraudster on the record of the accused in preparation for the document on the record of the accused / sale agreement in any definition of `counterfeiting 'and false document formation. There was no document that the accused had written to the complainant to sell and execute a piece of land. It can best be said that although the accused was not about the land agreed to be sold to the complainant, it was his son. And during his argument he was given the option to make such an agreement to sell the counselor to the accused, citing a document, the Special Power of Attorney, and then the accused's sons in his favor. Executed a general power of attorney under which he was given the authority. Therefore, the accused, the first person, section 2020, can be attributed to the commission of an offense under the PPC because it allegedly defrauded the complainant and dishonestly provided for the property, That is, Section 202020, a cash offense under PPC, was also a bailable offense, requesting bail, the accused offered to transfer the plot in the name of the complainant, perhaps, but perhaps he was misunderstood or Under the reason he is well known, he was not ready to accept the offer, in which case, in the case of the accused, the more desirable
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
