Sections 302 (b), 309, 310, 311 and 338E [as amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (I of 2005)] Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 345 (2A) ) [Amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (I of 2005)] After the murder and the compromise between the deceased and the accused, the heirs / legal heirs of both the accused, the defendants filed before the trial court wall Section 4545 ((?) ), Filed under the CRPC. The heirs of the victims were summoned and their statements were recorded. The trial court did not allow the offense to escalate and dismissed the request for extension of the crime on this basis. done Or that the accused had intentionally amended section 338E under the assassination order (1), through the PPC and Section 345, CR PC, through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, It was deemed to have committed an offense in the name of, or in the name of, customs, shadowing, and other customs or customs, or, with such circumstances, complex matters deemed to be imposed by the consent of the parties. Yes, the court will have no authority to impose or enforce the terms, given the facts and circumstances of the case, the enforcement of the terms was compulsory. The facts and circumstances of the cases under Chapter XVI of the C had to be resolved with the consent of the parties and the section 4545, referred to in the schedule under CR PC, even if the absconding, crooked, black Has been named after. Curry and similar rituals were complex and could be pardoned; the trial court refused to refuse the trial or the crime, and it violated the law.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
