Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Oma appreciated the evidence. The complainant had explained the immediate registration of the FIR at the police station and the post-mortem examination of the victim at the scheduled time was in accordance with the statements of the complainant and other witnesses. All material facts stated in the FIR, such as the identity of the accused, the location and the time of the incident, the ocular testimony did not suffer any contradiction or dishonest improvement; on the occasion the presence of four witnesses remained, otherwise neither F. The IR can be entered so quickly. , Nor could the post-mortem be performed on the same day, so preliminary medical evidence confirms the ocular account that eye witnesses cannot be expected to have a close relationship with the deceased for the actual culprit of an innocent person. Will be falsely involved. The incident proved that the accused had deliberately fled after the incident to protect his skin from C. Many parts of the law and Albee's request failed to set the record on any mitigating situation available to the accused. The accused's appeal was dismissed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
