Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus AHMAD ALI KHAN

Section 42 The evidence presented by the plaintiff cannot be denied by the appellate court of the plaintiff - Applicants' plaintiff / plaintiff's evidence was properly dismissed by the request for additional dismissed year's delay in the judgment of the plaintiffs I failed to indicate any kind of interference was asked to revise the simultaneous inquiries of the courts below under circumstances r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2011 YLR 1909
• Mst. JAMAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JATOI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARGARH 2011 CLC 1912
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 MLD 1914
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1916
• ABDUL HAMEED v. State 2011 MLD 1919
• KHALIDA PERVAIZ v. CITY EDUCATION BOARD 2011 CLC 1923
• SABIR HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 1924
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. RASHID AHMAD 2011 YLR 1926

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates email from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes