Section 2 30at Qatil Ahmed praising the record of evidence revealed that there was no enmity around the victim's residence. He was not only a laborer, but also a poor man. There was no motive on record of the accused's false involvement. It is alleged that he was involved by the complainant in provoking the villager of the village, for reasons that were meta and could not happen. Although the two eyewitnesses were brothers of the deceased, they did not find any element of disgust with the accused, and there was no prior rivalry between them, the presence of the prosecution witnesses at the scene of the incident was quite natural because they Were working in a nearby area. Neither the complainant nor the prosecution witnesses exaggerated the prosecutor's case, nor did any material contradiction or improvement be found in the statements of the prosecution witnesses. The statements of the witnesses could not be excluded on the basis of relationship. Both of the prosecution's witnesses were cross-examined, but the defense failed to prove anything. The statements of the prosecution's witnesses in favor of the accused were proved with the help of medical evidence; the prosecution's witnesses were extremely natural. Statements were made in the manner, there was no restraint in the prosecution's version, the prosecutor reasoned KK had completely proved his case against the accused outside the veil / in any material / case to reduce the amount of punishment it was alleged that the accused opened fire on the victim who left behind 8 orphans. The shots were repeated and he was about 40 years old, and his death sentence was sent to trial by the trial court.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
