Sections 13 and 15 (6) of the landlord and tenants of the tenants' relationship appeal to the Supreme Court decided in favor of the respondents, therefore, the petition for eviction by the appellants against the landlord and The appeal was simultaneously rejected by the rent controller. And the lower appellate court raised by appellant that the possession of the premises was not handed over to the respondents, so the occupant will be treated as long as his tenant is the respondent's Supreme Court order. In compliance with these orders of the Supreme Court, the settlement authorities issued a permanent transfer order in their favor. The respondents were not only the property owners in the dispute but also the landlord for that purpose while the confiscated reply. Was occupied by the occupants of the destroyed premises, which was in symbolic possession. The concurrent results of the two courts below the disputed property were the BA's on the record's admissible evidence and the High Court did not require any intervention in the same intervention.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
