Find a Lawyer

ZARRAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Attempts to respect the provisions of Sections 4 324 and 6 336, which lead to suffering. I applaud the evidence, at the relevant time, the presence of eyewitnesses was natural and they fully described the manner and manner of the incident in which the piece was reported. The relationship of the prosecution witnesses with the cross-examination complainant or the injured person could not eradicate their testimony. The incident was recognized. Was a proof of sovereignty. The prosecution's version would not produce any cracks in the trial. Minor contradictions in the evidence of the prosecutor were not important. The trial court in its original context appreciated the evidence on record. Did not face the weakness of the appeal was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. State 2011 YLR 781
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 782
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. State 2011 YLR 788
• MUHAMMAD AMIR v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2011 MLD 790
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ 2011 CLC 793
• MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR v. SNOBER PERVEEN 2011 MLD 799
• ASHFAQ HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 799
• RUSTAM KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 802

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Bannu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes