MST. SAFEER BEGUM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
A XVI, R 2 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition Additional evidence The defendant was the defendant in the lawsuit filed by the Technical Petitioner Defendant and intended to include some persons in the list of witnesses who indicated after the formation of the case. Was filed by Add the name to the list of witnesses, but the appellate court under consideration reversed the trial court's order in exercising the jurisdiction to amend. Under the trial court, O. XVI, R 2, CPC is at its discretion to seek new witnesses, if there is good reason for excluding their names. It was shown in the list that the element of good cause should be used by the trial court; there is no prohibition against seeking new witnesses as the lower parties of the appellate court have no right to bring the relevant evidence on record. The solution can be facilitated. The practice of dispute resolution jurisdiction with clarity and good reason erroneously prohibited the presence of evidence in the case that the arbitrary issue of allowing the recording of evidence for new witnesses was a matter for the trial court and on that basis Was used which did not identify illegal or unjust to require interference. The court allowed the order passed by the trial court to restore the order
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
