WAPDA TOWN EMPLOYEES\' UNION THROUGH PRESIDENT/SECRETARY versus APDA EMPLOYEES\' COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, GUJRANWALA
Sections 9, 12 and 50 constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application was allowed by the Labor Court to cancel the registration of the trade union, but the matter was directed to decide the trade union registration dispute, Registrar Trade Unions Sent to The Petitioner (Employees' Union) had relinquished the matter after being affiliated with the employer. The simple dispute between the parties through the constitutional constitutional petition was whether the consent of the employer was necessary before the registration of the trade union in the Establishment. Even a trade union didn't even have one. Locus Standi to maintain the grievance petition, simply because the objections raised by them were not attended by the Registrar of Trade Unions, or were not associated with the employer or trade union registration process, affecting the One Trade Union. Could not be The matter of registration of the party trade union through the registration of another union was between the trade union Ion who applied for registration and the Registrar of the trade unions and the employer or the other union had no surveyor in this matter. The Registrar of the United States cannot claim to have challenged the trade unions' decision. The registrar, trade unions, were remanded, with the Labor Court-approved impeachment order linking the employer in the process to the decision of the registration case. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
