Section 302/324/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 23 of Pakistan's Constitution, Article 199 QTIL AMD, QTIL AMD Attempt and Terrorism Act Constitutional Request Anti-Terrorism Court The accused was moved to move the case against the applicant under Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to a court of common jurisdiction, the litigation complainant stated in the FIR His brother was identified after firing at his car, which provided clear evidence. Intended to work only with his brother, nor anyone else who could have been saved by being targeted by the assailants in the same vehicle, although the names of the suspects in the FIR did not appear, the incident occurred despite enmity and Personal retaliation, as demonstrated by the complainant's subpoena to the police, in which he clearly stated all of these facts. The previous hostility had led to the incident, in which case neither terrorism had occurred nor any sectarian issue, instead it was killed because of previous hostility between the parties. Could not have done it anyway. The Anti-Terrorism Court declared illegal fall in the scope of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act I997, while the controversial order was passed by passing an order passed to try the crime and the case was dismissed. Was transferred to the General Court. According to the law, the jurisdiction of the case was allowed according to the constitutional petition
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
