Section 2 302 (b) appreciating the evidence of the convict was a widespread incident and immediately after filing an FIR, all the necessary details of the incident were properly described by the complainant, who is the real daughter of the victim. Yes, there was no previous hostility between the parties and the accused was the only designated suspect in the FIR prosecution, to prove that the ocular account had examined the victim's real son, who had no enmity with the accused. And there was no reason for the accused to make false accusations through the witness. His statement was not only straightforward, but it was consistent and coherent in all material aspects of the case, and said that the medical evidence made the statement controversial and the recovery of the weapon of the crime was reinforced, by the Chemical Examiner and the serologist. Blood-stained reports were positive. To prove that the theft recovered from the defendant's instance was human blood, it was not enough to discredit my relationship with the witness, the absence of other witnesses was not harmful to the prosecution, because, FI In the case of a single accused named in R, there is no evidence that it was impossible that the killers and relatives would release the original culprit and prosecute an innocent person in a murder case. The suspect has since been able to prove his case against the accused and there is no definite reason for his intervention in section 2302. (B), the trial court's notice of the conviction of the accused under PPC which was in accordance with the law and was upheld
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
