IRFAN ALI ALIAS GHULAM RAZA ALIAS RAMZAN versus STATE
Section 302/324/436/427 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Section 3/7 Explosion Due to, Terrorism, Kill The definition of naughty, the FIR included the names of all the victims of the evidence and the fact that it was merely a conference of the nature of the party, open to every body, so every victim for the complainant There was no possibility to know the name and the parents. And despite the details of the names of those killed and injured, there is no mention in the FIR of the fact about how the car, allegedly used in the explosion, was erected and who was standing. There were no details of the details of its properties. In the FIR, 40 investigative reports were provided to the accused, prepared, the names of the deceased and the injured were not known to the complainant even otherwise. , The intensity of the blast spread panic and caused the entire city to shake. The filing of the FIR within 1/2 hour of the names of all the victims and the casualties showed that the car, which was allegedly used in the explosion, was listed after deliberation and consultation. Was identified by reading the chassis number. But the FIR says there was no chassis number in the witness's allegation of car robbery; no witnesses disclosed sources of information about how he found the car used in the explosion. The prosecutor did not want to be named.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
