Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TANVEER versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL

In Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXIII, RR 1 and 2, the plaintiff claims that the defendant withdrew the first case for possession without the court's permission. And the current case was timely banned. The decree under the declaration between the parties was finalized not to be challenged by the defendant. The plaintiff did not claim that she was in illegal possession of the suit land. Order to seize because of this order, the reason for which he came to him daily and because the plaintiff is the owner of the suit land he can claim the leave again and before that the court. Without a permit, the case will not be obstructed. The suit was ordered to take possession of his land

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• ABDUL HAMEED v. State 2011 PLD 504
• NASIR NAWAZ through Muhammad Bukhsh v. ASSISTANT DIRETOR, MINES AND MINERAL 2011 CLD 507
• MUHAMMAD BAKHSH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 509
• SAEED AKHTAR v. QAISER RASHEED 2011 YLR 509
• TANVIR HUSSAIN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SAFDARABAD, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA 2011 PLD 516
• SAMIULLAH v. State 2011 YLR 517
• PUNNAM KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 517
• ALI SARWAR v. Syed SHUJAT ALI NAQVI 2011 PLD 519

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

property advocate from Hyderabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes