Find a Lawyer

SAMIULLAH versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 379 and 411 of theft, receiving stolen property fraudulently with their co-accused and then the police complainant and other prosecution witnesses in their affidavits It was alleged that he is the driver of the vehicle, two WAPDA employees may have been present when the co-accused was present. The accused was given the impression that he had the option of installing the transformer and moving it to another location, in which case, further investigation was required in connection with the offense under section 497 (2). ), CR PC suspect admitted on bail in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD BAKHSH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 509
• SAEED AKHTAR v. QAISER RASHEED 2011 YLR 509
• MUHAMMAD TANVEER v. MUHAMMAD JAMIL 2011 PLD 511
• TANVIR HUSSAIN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SAFDARABAD, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA 2011 PLD 516
• PUNNAM KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 517
• ALI SARWAR v. Syed SHUJAT ALI NAQVI 2011 PLD 519
• DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE CANTT. through Secretary v. PUNJAB CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED through Secretary 2011 CLC 520
• IRFAN ALI alias GHULAM RAZA alias RAMZAN v. State 2011 YLR 522

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

tax advocates from Toru lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes