DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE CANTT. THROUGH SECRETARY versus PUNJAB CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED THROUGH SECRETARY
Clauses 54, & 70 and A 70 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Section 54 Controversy between societies Mandatory jurisdiction Scope of jurisdiction Claimant against society discovered by the courts below the society. The mandatory injunction was called for a restraining order, which was rejected by the trial court as per the trial. And the lower appellate court, in favor of the plaintiff, pleaded that the defendant's case was not sustained under section 70 of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925 - that the issue of jurisdiction was a piece of land, causing both parties to Had claimed. Section 54A of the Co-operative Society Act 1925 nor the provisions of Section 70A, the permanent injunction of section 54, 70 or 70A of the Co-operative Society Act 1925 will not be obstructed by the business touching the business of the society. The order was not barred under the trial of the relevant Co-operative Society Act, 1925, and the lower appellate court also raised the issue of rationality. h. In the light of the evidence between the parties, all the issues and contradictions between the parties in detail were recorded by the two courts against the defendant's society, and the conclusions of law and jurisdiction were reviewed. Cannot be interfered with by the High Court. The society failed to identify any type of illegal, weak, misreading / reading of evidence or error in the verdict and the orders passed by the two courts in the judgment were dismissed in the circumstances. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
