SAJIDA ABDULLAH (ESE TEACHER) versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER
Article 199 Constitution Petition Maintenance Civil Service Transfer Petitioner who was posted at the school place mutual D mutual, through mutual transfer, exchanged and posted at the school `S \ Applicant was added to his new posting location , But only after thirteen days his transfer order was canceled and he was transferred to another location. The applicant alleged that the order for mutual exchange has been canceled without giving any valid reason and this is not only on the administrative order but also on the political pressure of the local MPA. By impugned order, not only the applicant's basic / fundamental rights were seized but it was also against the spirit of the government-initiated Wedlock policy; illegal, illegal and unconstitutional. Was violated and this policy was announced. By the government, the constitutional petition filed against this order was able to be sustained before the High Court if one spouse in one government department was deployed in one city and another spouse was posted in another city, so surely Both of them were experiencing mental distress, the consequences were not just for them but for them as well. The government and state treasury as well as the applicant's lawyer's view that the impeachment order was passed due to political pressure from the local MPA was reinforced as if a gross violation of the Woodlock policy. And the order was placed aside for no good reason, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
