Section 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11, sued for permanent injunction claiming that it had a suit land, but defendants were interfering with the plaintiff's possession without cause. Although the statement acknowledges the possession of the plaintiff on some land, the plaintiff could not show his exclusive possession of the property, the plaintiff had a case under which the trial was to decide on the merit after settling the necessary matters, but both below The courts dismissed the plaintiff. About the Plaintiff The Plaintiffs mentioned by the following courts, respectively, instructed the trial court to decide the issue of eligibility after making the necessary matters on the facts question. Was gone
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
