The plaintiff, who filed a Section 42 lawsuit, claims that the sale was forged and forged in favor of the defendants. Once the sale proceedings were made by the plaintiff, the plaintiff's position that the matter was not considered, especially when the defendants had no stability. There was no question in the cross-examination by the claimant regarding the avoidance of payment. The courts below recorded the simultaneous discovery of facts against the plaintiff's marginal witnesses, writing to prove the execution of the registered cell death plaintiff, which could not shake the evidence of the defendant's witnesses. And could not identify the misrepresentation of evidence by the courts under which the amendment was rejected \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
