Section 13 Contemporary Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 75, 76 and 129 (E) of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 Pre-Impression Suite Talks Ashdad, Pre-Impressor's Yellow Performance, which, after learning about it One of the witnesses, together with two witnesses, prepared a notice of such toll from a lawyer and sent it to the shopkeeper through a registered post so that such notice would be received and a copy of the postal receipt image would be sent. Not by the statement of the person who sent such notice, the confirmation by pre-testimony is terminated by a sworn statement by the lawyer's statement through a stigma. One witness of such notice died immediately after, while the other witness and his author as a lawyer were not examined by the pre-importer if the original postal receipt of such notice was retained and Has been proved on record, then speculated under Section 24 of the General Clause Act, 1897 and Article 129 of the Martyrdom Act. , 1984 would tilt in favor of the person sending such notice that nothing was available on the record as to what happened to the original postal receipt of such notice. If such notice was sent to the seller, then the emperor would have received his confession back (without affirmation either denied or received notice), the idea would have been in favor of the former Umtpur only. Keeping a copy of such image on the record will not obliterate the former umpire for the facts to which such claim is based, as the claim is based on. The document should have been proved by its author as well. It will not be proven in the absence of proof of its author, however
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
