Sections 5 (c), 5 (da) and 25 (b) of the plaintiff were charged with the bargaining, acquisition of anonymous assets with the developers / company for the purchase of the house and the defendant submitted an affidavit in this regard. It was submitted that the petitioner's objection is that NAB cannot recover the amount deposited by the defendant as the cost of the sale paid by the customer cannot be returned to the third party. The company was not subject to any legal force as the defendant only contracted the sale, which could not be equated with the sale process, because the seller could not give the property any right or title in the prima, the defendant would have no income. Had no known source. In connection with the booking of the National Accountability Bureau's house, the applicant was not only deposited with the company during the inquiry but found that the accused had registered in the name of his wife but also the amount, which is now Was submitted by the accused's spouse till now, which was part of the crime that the accused had issued to the petitioner through the NAB to recover the money deposited by the public. The defendant's husband did not face any illegal interference by the High Court refused to interfere with NAB's demand for a refund.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
