A. VIII, R10 and AXLI, R1 (b) Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 6 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and 14 of the trial court's written statement Entered right of entry An appeal was filed by the Additional District Judge, but was later allowed to be withdrawn on grounds of legal jurisdiction. The plaintiff asserts that the remedial proceedings under OVIII, R 10, CPC cannot be made without providing a copy of the plaintiff against him. On the eighth, under R10, the defendant was punished, the CPC could not proceed against the defendant without providing the copy of the plaintiff which should have been sent with the summons to resolve the issues or At its first hearing, the Additional District Judge committed it. While admitting the appeal despite the lack of jurisdiction, the erroneous forum said before the forum that the appeal was pending for 6 months even though it was not sustained under the OLLI, R1 (b), not the CPC Ligant. Could be made. A. The trial of error related to the error committed by the courts was accepted with the direction of the trial court to allow the plaintiff to file a written statement.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
