Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Determination of evidence for possession of narcotic drugs was solely and reliably influenced by the recovery of the narcotic drug from the accused's possession. Her father was involved in 21 cases of prosecution witnesses against the prosecution in such cases not only the accused was defaming the image of the country, but also the drug addiction of the country's younger generation and these conditions. The prosecution confirmed the culprits and the culprits

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. AKRAM HUSSAIN 2011 CLC 755
• Mst. SUGHRAN AFZAL v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT 2011 YLR 758
• MUHAMMAD SOHAIL AKHTAR v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE; PUNJAB LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 759
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR NAZ v. State 2011 MLD 759
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. Shahzada KHURRAM NAZIR 2011 YLR 763
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2011 PCrLJ 766
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2011 YLR 767
• RIZWANA SHAHEEN v. Ch. GHULAM MUSTAFA 2011 CLC 768

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes