Section 5 and Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The cross-examination of a plaintiff's witness for the recovery and recovery of the indoor money by the wife was completed when, on the basis of some urgency, the lawyer for the plaintiff demanded an adjournment and Not presented. Counsel for the defendant (husband) of the remaining witnesses objected on the basis that, due to further cross-examination, his cross-examination would be disclosed and that he would be allowed to file trial court hours. Will complete the cross-inspection within 15 minutes before closing. The court dismissed the affidavit filed by the plaintiff as well as the fixed evidence for evidence of the remaining witnesses and the plaintiff's documentary evidence. The trial court ruled that the order issued by the trial court was a false order and that the constitutional petition records a stable record that the plaintiff positively directed the court to produce evidence but refused to do so, and the trial. Nothing illegal in the court's order was found, the lace is pending and had not yet been decided by the trial court, which was naturally a mutual agreement that the constitutional petition was not challenged. The High Court rejected. General Chat Chat Lounge n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
