Section 2302 (b) definition of conviction evidence. The eyewitnesses had faithfully refined their statements in the trial, to make their testimony suspicious and untrustworthy, in order to supplement their evidence with medical evidence and to meet the lacunae left in the prosecution's case. An FIR was lodged after a preliminary investigation by the police. At the relevant time, the presence of eyewitnesses did not prove that the medical evidence had violated the ocular evidence and that there was no light in the FIR. The source was not told and the motive of the attackers was not possible at the site plan, the location of the night of the identification was not recorded and the motive for the crime was kept for three weeks in the mall without any further investigation. The plaintiff failed to reconcile the prosecution's behalf. The situation is how the two accused were fired from the gun they recovered upon being informed of the crime, according to the FIR, who fired the gun on the deceased alone, even to the otherwise ocular evidence. The recovery itself did not constitute a basis for the offense after the dismissal, the prosecution's case was full of suspicion, the benefit which the accused had to go to. As his right suspect was acquitted under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
