Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 172 (2) (xviii) Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), sections 17 and O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 the plaintiff submits, submits and submits the permanent injunction The lawsuit was filed for trial on the grounds that the controversial change was approved without its free consent and that the disputed property was temporarily separated by an invalid gift request for a restraining order. The plaintiff based on the territorial jurisdiction had partially granted the plaintiff's request. The boundary of the disputed house, but refused to order in relation to the agricultural land, that the division of agricultural land in the civil court was not pending, the same day the plaintiff's arguments were approved and his signature was obtained from this excuse. That one of the disputed properties was located in the L to confirm that the same was required to confirm the inheritance change and that under Section 17, the CPC filed the trial of the plaintiff in the court. Holds that the order should be granted only to the extent of 1/6 share. The plaintiff, however, had no power because the inheritance change was challenged and a partition order was invoked, however, none of the defendants was able to separate the disputed portion of the disputed property. Granted No. The High Court partially allowed the appeal and instructed one of the defendants not to set aside 2/3 of the disputed property until the settlement of the case, however, it would retain its proportional 1 of the disputed property order. Can sell 3 / 3rds.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
