Section 2 302 (b) appreciation of the nature of the evidence was presented to the accused and the deceased's information was immediately registered in the FIR and a post-mortem was made within five hours of the incident for which no time. Was not available. The complainant or the police referred to the witness's name in a regular inquiry report to add the matter, when the police presence also proved the witness's presence at the scene, it was said that the witness was the neighbor of the complainant and his His presence at the scene was more than natural. Only the suspect was named as the accused and the role of shooting the 12-person gun on the victim was attributed to him, at the time of the incident, according to a post-mortem report. An eyewitness account identified as such a weapon and injury was a case presented by eyewitnesses to a single charge. Zim was against and son filed an FIR, there is no reason for the victim to have no reason to accuse the son of false accusations and the victim's relatives did not usually substitute the red culprit. Was. No crime was cleared from the scene of the crime. Police seized the blood stains on the spot and the bunk on which the victim was present was taken into custody which provided assistance to the ocular account which The seat of injury was such that the accused's motive was clear and he believed that such injury would result in death and that nothing could be done other than that, the prosecution proved its case against the accused on its soil. Had made any record against the accused in any theory of punishment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
