Section 22 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), A XXXVII, R 2, O XXI, RR 10, 89, 90 and Section 48 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 165, 166 and 181 Order for Recovery of Debt In the case of directing the sale of the residential property to the plaintiff bank, the appellant / property owners had filed an objection which the Implementing Court had imposed under Article 166 of the Limitation Act 1908 and the Articles 165 and 166, the Limitation Act, 1908. The appellant / object applicants claimed that they never kept the property with the bank. The suit land was not mortgaged by the appellant on the case of suit land, the judge filed. tor did not obtain a Revenue Intervention Certificate from the Department of Revenue before filing a lawsuit. In approving the suit property affiliation order and subsequently the auctioneer who evicted the property owners, the enforcement court did not consider that the request for execution was timely. The fact of the remaining boundaries was decided by a dispute without the formulation of a case and the recording of any evidence. Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, for the separation of sale within thirty days from the date of sale, for a petition filed by any person referred to in the XXI, RR 89 and 90, CPC The provisions of the first application are provided for a period of 3 years. The court erred in acting under section 22 of the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Receiving Loans and Financials) Act 1997 for the implementation of a decree, which was enforced after a dispute between the parties, Could not apply. Appeal allowed with disappointment was banking
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
