GHULAM MASHIH ALBERT GILL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE/COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL
Defendant, challenged in the order of acceptance of the plaintiff's request for interim injunction, has not been named in Section 2 Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 Suit of Power of Attorney. Dismissed an application to enforce 's legal heritage The co-defendant, who died during the sentencing appeal, represented the separate principal body as the general counsel, the defendant and a principal and a lawyer between the principal / firm and on the provisions of the Power of Attorney Act. Was ruled by the source. The Principal, through the powers of the Attorney, gave the Principal some powers that he would exercise on his behalf and was canceled or terminated by the Principal as soon as the name of the Principal Authority or Lawyer was canceled. The responsibility was fulfilled. Or the death of either party by the Principal or the death of the attorney authority given by the Principal to either party, therefore, the authority granted to the lawyer was not inherited by the legal heirs / the deposed lawyer's representatives. Cannot be brought to justice by such a lawyer. , There can be no repression on its legal heritage. The plaintiff failed to identify any wrongdoing, material misconduct, jurisdictional error or failure to read the record, which was approved in accordance with the law. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
