The trial court for the specific performance of the Section 12 agreement dismissed the defendant's appeal of the defendant's refusal to execute the contract to sell his predecessor, which it claimed was time-barred. The plaintiff did not file a specific performance claim during the lifetime. The plaintiff in the interest of the defendant suit barred the filing after a 23-year indefinite delay, when the record was not signed by the plaintiff in the interest of the plaintiff on the evidence of the owner of the property Unless there was an agreement. Both sides signed, no rights or obligations of the parties were made where the seller did not sign the contract, it cannot be said that the terms and conditions of the agreement have been agreed, only This person can only be considered a party. When he signs such an agreement, the seller's contract can be of no benefit to the plaintiff, nor can anyone find the performance of the contract which the vendor did not sign, and he appreciates the termination agreement. I did not come up with plaintiff's documentary evidence that did not support his version. The courts were less than erroneous, and the circumstances were accepted when declaring the plaintiff's review case \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
