Sections 15, 22 (6) and 28 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Amendment of leave application for default selection for payment of rent Special Judge Rent amended the tenant's request for leave Dismissing the appeal, the appellate court dismissed the appeal on the ground that it was unable to maintain an appeal against mutual orders; the appeal under section 28 (2) of the Punjab Rated Premises Act, 2009 does not lie against inter-religious orders. The bid, therefore, was rightly appealed by the Additional District Judge that the Affordable Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009, however, in appropriate cases. There was no special restriction on the written response / modification of the application; no one can be punished for the act of the court. In order to be competent in the circumstances to be granted leave to amend the request was beyond the scope of the request and the typographical M was the result of presenting a person with the right to vote for the effective decision of the matter. Clerical or typographical error should not obstruct the path of justice No limitation was set for filing an application for amendment of application or responding to the request Special Judge Rent erred in rejecting the request and They failed to exercise their jurisdiction, aug Although the appeal was not sustained in view of section 28 (2) of the Punjab Rated Premises Act, 2009, the abuses resulting from the gross abortion of justice can be removed. The High Court's Constitution filed under Article 199 of the Constitution
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
