MUHAMMAD AMIN ALIAS JALOO versus JUDGE BANKING COURT
Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, Rr 66, 89 and 90 The request made by the auctioneer for the execution of the judgment on the sale of the order was that the auction of the valuable property be a reserve price. The delivery of O XXI, R 66, CPC was made by the court without determining. Its nature was compulsory and without the full requirements, it would not have happened if there had been some auction. It is understood that a specific order was legally required under O XXI, R 66, CPC, in which a court declaration was announced and the terms of the sale were overcome. The intention of the law was to set the reserve price in the declaration of protection of decision rights. Along with the Lending Exit Court, Court Alamire committed material irregularities by auctioning and accepting a bid without fixing the reserve price of the land; neither the reserve price was mentioned in the auction order nor any other. The terms and conditions were mentioned until notice was given to the creditor of the decision which was set by the Court of Elware that he had no connection with the price in the market because such price was not without legal authority. Was not The auction took place and it was also illegal that the order passed by the Executing Court was set aside and the auction proceedings were declared illegal and without any legal authority, as the order for the property to be auctioned. Was not happening, accordingly the appeal was allowed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
