Section 59 [as amended by the Punjab Tenancy (Amendment) Act (IV of 1951, Section 2]] General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), Section 6 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the suit. Following the declaration trial, the appeal court dismissed the plaintiffs' children / children's children who requested that the inheritance change be confirmed after amending section 59 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. The expulsion was unlawful, before the amendment of section 59 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, the possession was concerned with the widow of a deceased tenant and in the absence of any male offspring. The limited owner of the plaintiff's contract refers to the change that was made after the amendment of section 59 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, so he inherits possession under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. Without any reasonable law, unless the death of a person occurred, until the death of a person, his legacy was opened to the person who was entitled to it, and it would depend on the latter. Died, then section 59 of the Punjab Tenancy Act was retained, therefore, after amending section 59 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, his daughter A. Excluding the widow left to confirm change, the occupancy rights were dependent on their male offspring, which normally Claus Act, 1897 had no view of the section 6. Warrant no interference review rejected circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
