SHAHZADA KHURRAM NAZIR versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 3 (A), 4, 17 (4), 43 A&55 Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983, RR 10 (2) (3) and 15 (1) Companies Ordinance (XLVI of 1984) , Constitution Section 42 of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner petitioner challenged the acquisition proceedings that because of his land being agricultural, Punjab Land Acquisition Rules cannot be obtained in view of R10 (3) of 1983 and it That the respondents / industrial estate is wholly owned by the provincial government. Do not transfer the acquired land to any other institution as such transfer would be guilty of sections 43A and R15 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act of 1983, Land Acquisition Act of 1894, 1894. Distinguishing cultural and non-cultural land, whether the land was located in the vicinity of a town or not, petitioner failed to identify a clause in the Land Acquisition Act 1894 that precluded the acquisition of cultural land. Rule 1 (3) of the Punjab Land Acquisition Rule 1983 (3) was intended to exclude cultural land around a town from the Land Acquisition Act 1894, which resulted in R10 (3) and land. There was a clear contradiction between the provisions of the. In the event of a contradiction or contradiction between the Parents Act and the rules made thereunder, the law shall prevail and such rules shall be illegal and ineffective by law, in the Punjab Land Law, 1983, the best There were guidelines for principles. Acquisition officers were not, however, complying with Rule 10 (3) of the Punjab Land Rules, 1983, which did not comply with the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Anonymous information cannot be killed on the basis that the same is true
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
