MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHATTAK versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 3 (1) (b) and 11 (3) (a) Ordinance of Banking Companies (LVII of 1962), Section 41 Article 19, Article 199 (I) (b) of the Corporate / Commercial Banking Constitution of Pakistan (ii) The applicant for the appointment and eligibility of the President's Bank of Veranto to the Constitutional Petition accepted the responsibility of appointing the defendant as a plaintiff, on the basis that he has the qualification for that position. If not required then the respondent had no experience in banking and was never held any post. In any capacity, the experience of a banker's respondents was limited to the sugar industry where he was considered an expert analyst and an authority on the subject and had also served as an association executive. , Economics or no degree. Based on qualifications and experience developed by the Business Administration, and the State Bank of Pakistan did not meet the appropriate and appropriate test, which also explained the State Bank's refusal. To clear or approve his appointment as President of Zarai Development Bank Limited, Pakistan as respondent was illegal on the basis of violation of the provisions of section 41 of the Zarai Development Bank Limited Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962, As a Regulation of Commercial Regulation / Commercial Banking and Section 11 (3) (a) of the Banks (Nationalization) Act of 1974 for the State Bank Corporation, neither was approved nor approved by the State Bank of Pakistan President Zarai was eligible for appointment to Turkey Bank Limited, as he, on any banking experience, announced that the High Court had declared Respondent to the post of Atty Bank Limited
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
