Sections 2 (c) (k), 25 and 28 u Consumer \ `Services \ Meaning and Scope Consumer Court compensated complainant / student for Rs 20,000 which the university had failed because of its assignment. Was not sent to the Controller Examination of the University by its tutor University, claiming that the complainant, as a student, was not a "user" as per clause (c) of Section 2 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 Was stated and that the services provided by the University also do not fall under the definition of services which is included in the clause (s). The Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005, Validity University was an educational institution and could not be defined as a commercial activity, under which the term consumer a was defined in clause (c) of section 2 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005. That was, the consideration and appreciation of the case in which the application was made by a student to attend any exam was neither an academic institution nor a student appearing for the examination conducted by the University. The user cannot be described as as defined in section 2 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 ( Yop) was in, and the university was considered a "service provider" status. The complaint filed by the students under section 2 (k) of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005 was not entertained by the consumer, the appeal was accepted and the defamation order was set aside \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
