Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd Proof of proof - delay of approximately four hours in filing of FIR and delay of twenty-two hours in connection with post mortem inspection of deceased, filing of case after consultation and consideration. Was suggested. The reason for this was not proven as the prosecution was not sure about the actual culprits of the incident, the complainant changed his entire version of the FIR, while filing it in court. During the hearing, other witnesses also improved their statements at the trial. The witness did not specify his presence at the time of the incident and therefore it cannot be believed that the natural and independent witness available to the deceased at the time of the incident was suppressed by the prosecution, as the accused and likely by Had won It was that he was not ready to support the false version of the prosecution; on the very first day of the incident, no crime was cleared and a crime was then sent to the forensic science laboratory with a gun recovered from the suspect's possession. Was given, he made his positive report dubious and had no result and no incident was disclosed and the accused was involved after the incident while on suspicion the accused was acquitted. Was done.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
