QADIR YAR ALIAS SONI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHINIOT
Section 7 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 Determination of the Age of Investigation Officer of the accused after verifying the accused's birth certificate, a separate invoice for his trial under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance Was prepared, 2000 Sessions Court directed the Medical Board at the request of the complainant to determine the age of the accused, which was found at the age of 23 as a result of his ossication test, five of the Medical Board After the senior doctors underwent an ossication test, the suspect unanimously found out that he was 23 years old in the absence of documentary evidence. The best way to determine age was to have a radiologist test / report, which was based on highly technical and advanced results. The equipment suspect himself admitted to issuing a National Identity Card that was present on the record with evidence to show that the accused was not a minor at the time of the alleged incident and could not be prosecuted under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance. Yes, the 2000 order was not subject to any illegal action or the weakness review request was dropped accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
