Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus KAMRAN KHAN

Section 6 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 114 Review Suits For pre-arrest trial, the trial court dismissed the dismissal case. The petition contends that the appellate court wrongly reviewed the evidence presented by the plaintiff's property plaintiff, requesting a re-examination and in-depth appreciation through a review application which already limited the scope of the review. Where the review request cannot be entertained where it is being retried. Discuss the central issue or if the same material was again made through such request, the fate of the case must have a material impact on the error identified by the review application; Cannot identify patent error of any kind. The record review request was rejected

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Mst. QAISRA BIBI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 923
• ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY v. IRFAN BOOTA 2011 CLD 927
• NAIMAT ULLAH v. State 2011 MLD 930
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 933
• Raja KHALID MAHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 939
• GHULAM QASIM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE LAYYAH 2011 MLD 941
• SHAHBAZ AHMED v. State 2011 PCrLJ 943
• IJAZ AHMED v. FOZIA YOUSAF 2011 YLR 944

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

famous high court advocate from Piplan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes