Find a Lawyer

MST. SUMAIRA NOREEN versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (COLLEGES) SIALKOT

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment and Termination of Service Applicant, who was appointed as the Office Manager, joined his duties and served the Department, but later his services were served on that basis. But it was terminated that she was not eligible for the post. Dismissing date because she did not have 5 years experience. Applicant challenged the order of suspension that if any illegal activity was committed by the department itself, it would be responsible for its own unlawful action. Cannot revert / revert its order while taking advantage. On the basis that the applicant could not benefit because the applicant lacked basic qualifications / experience at the time of initial appointment. It was not illegal work or irregularities by the department as the applicant himself was not eligible for the post. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Kanwar MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN 2011 PLD 479
• SULTAN AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab 2011 PLC(CS) 480
• FARAZ AHMAD BHUTTA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 PLD 483
• AHMAD HASSAN v. State 2011 YLR 483
• NABILA KIANI v. Mst. FAROOQ SULTAN 2011 CLC 487
• GULFAM AHMED v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2011 PCrLJ 487
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN SABRI v. SECRETARY HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 PLD 490
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PASRUR 2011 PLD 493

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

how to become a advocate from Abbaspur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes