Appreciation of Section 9 (C) Drug Seizure Evidence A large quantity of proportioned articles were recovered from the secret cavities of a truck stopped by the anti-drug force staff; a nexus of both persons charged with the truck was also set on record. , They said. The truck was registered in the name of someone else, but the truck's ownership was set on record in the name of an accused. The parcel / packet separated for chemical analysis was tested positive by the forensic science laboratory, with both suspects previously. His confessional statements were recorded. The statements of the Judicial Magistrate voluntarily recorded and without any compulsion and compulsion, and there was no reason to deny them, said the presence of the witness was also acknowledged by one of the accused prosecutors. Without doubt, the presence of a large quantity of proportional substance from secret cavity was the truck's ES, which was related to the consciousness of the two accused. And the mens rea of both the accused, in the circumstances, was also set on record The prosecution's witnesses were consistent with the material contradictions in their statements when it was established on the record that the material recovered was intoxicating. Turns out a lawsuit was filed against a man who had been charged with rejecting material brought against him by the prosecution defense version given by the accused, which was not helpful either. Failing to dismiss the evidence against him, the appellant said that the two accused were acquitted and sentenced and that The trial court upheld the sentence
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
