Sections 497 (2) and (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 408/420/471/34 Criminal breach of trust as a forged document, fraud, revocation of bail, application for accused There was nothing recovered from their possession, nor was there any confessional statement made by them. The trial court will examine the merits of the case when evidence will be filed in the trial court while granting bail. The qualities were not discussed in depth. The accused were indicted, did not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, CRPC was a rule to guarantee bail in such cases and an exception was denied, despite the fact that huge sums of money. Was apprehended, it was suspected who was responsible for the corruption that could only be determined by the trial court on the recording of evidence. Strong and unusual grounds were needed to revoke the bail granted to the accused by a competent court. The bail order did not demand interference in the accused in misappropriating the bail exemption as the untimely order was not vulnerable to any type of weakness, irregularity or abortion, no trial for cancellation of bail. Anyway, the request to cancel the bail was dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
