Sections 4 324 and q 337 D Murder Ahmad's compliment and the appreciation of Jephah's testimony was full of suspicion on the face of the complainant, which requires careful scrutiny. The complainant never mentioned the presence of both the prosecution witnesses, the presence of the complainant, the accused and the witnesses, as shown in the site plan prepared by the complainant, would make it impossible to understand that the witnesses were the accused. Why was rescued because the complainant's allegation was so much more than the prosecutor's testimony that the complainant's person The victim's brother was injured. Police were never told by the complainant which part of his body he was hurt in. Police did not recover any blood and blood on the spot. Is gone Injury on the complainant could not be proved on record as the complaining doctor was not presented to the court when the complaint exists. The ant and the prosecution witnesses were not proved on the spot, able to consider their statement. The accused's false execution cannot be disclosed and his accompanying accomplice cannot be denied, the prosecution has failed to prove beyond any reasonable doubt against the accused, on behalf of the accused. Appeals allowed, sentencing, sentencing and penalties imposed by the trial court's wrong judgment. Yes, it was set aside. And he got rid of the accusations leveled against him
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
