Find a Lawyer

QUDRATULLAH versus STATE

No further investigation from the accused in the robbery, FIR, with murder convictions under Section 497 Explosive Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 302 and 396 of the murder bail, was made a 17-day statement of testimony. Delay was recorded No ocular evidence has been attached to the commission of the crime and further investigation is needed. No equipment was recovered from the suspect's possession or the suspect's identity. Was not free from suspicion Medical evidence was admitted on bail on contradictory allegations of FIR

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• LAL ZADA v. State 2011 YLR 377
• AJMAL v. MUNTAZIR SHAH 2011 MLD 381
• Mst. AMINA BIBI v. ATTAULLAH WAZIR 2011 CLC 384
• AKHTAR MUNIR v. State 2011 YLR 397
• GULMEER v. State 2011 YLR 411
• MEERAN SHAH v. SAMEEN ULLAH KHAN 2011 CLC 413
• MUHAMMAD SAJID v. SAIF-UR-REHMAN 2011 PCrLJ 416
• Syed ZAMAN v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2011 PCrLJ 423

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Zahir Pir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes