Section 4 3233/3377 F (Q) Attempts to commit Qatil Adham and Hashima were acquitted of the charges against two co-accused on the strength of this evidence, while the accused was tried and sentenced, according to the complaint filed by his father. Observed. Who was present at the relevant time, but omitted the key witness, who in his first report to the police was the first to complain of a prosecutor's case, calling the three accused the main character of the shooting. , While he has improved his statement as a prosecution witness and has presented the effective role given by the complainant in his report and stated in his statement as the prosecution's witnesses once again In his complaint, he complained that he was present. Her father attacked her in the fields when the suspect attacked her, but on the occasion of Inkype's father, the investigating officer prepared a site plan. Initially, it was a plot at some distance from his farm, working in the fields. Neither was proven on record as the prosecution had failed to prove a particular motive as he had alleged in his report, the prosecutor, in those circumstances, had failed to prove the accused. Impressive evidence of trust The conviction and sentence filed by the trial court against the accused were set aside and released
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
