Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. GULAB JAN versus STATE


Section 497 Narcotic Material Stances Control Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and possession of 29 drug bail, the defendant's denial could not justify his presence in the prohibited vehicle carrying car and failed to prove that They were not conscious. Prohibited presence of the accused states that the vehicle is sufficiently sufficient to be connected to the recovery. A person who is considered to be in possession of illicit articles will be deemed to have committed the crime when Unless the contrary is proved. Under section 29 of the Drug Substance Control Act 1997, rejecting the notion that the accused believed he was traveling in a car because hitchhiking crews could not be trusted, CRPC Separated them. Concessions, bail pleas dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Hasilpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.