Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 disclosure of the relationship of landlords and tenants to tenants was granted against the applicants by the controller and eviction on the ground that the petitioner raised the rent by the applicants. The controller had no jurisdiction to decide the title of the property, the address of the tenant's appraisal was in relation to the landlord and tenant, in which it was fully established. This tenant violated the provisions of Section 13 (2) (II) of the West Pakistan Citizen Rental Restrictions Ordinance 1959, and moved or prohibited the applicants under question without permission or written consent and Applicants were not allowed to make or impersonate them unnecessarily. West Pakistan Civil Restriction Ordinance 1959 Act, claiming the absence of a relationship with the tenant as a Tenancy Restriction Ordinance 1959 to extend any hypothesis or c, which resolves the civil nature of the dispute. And any sub-organization or offer of a tenancy agreement in relation to the title or relationship may be viewed. And has been resolved in connection with this tenancy agreement, however, in a remote, complex and complex question of title or any question of illegally occupying a property not related to the tenancy agreement. , The rental controller had no jurisdiction to independently attempt this query and to provide any inquiries related to it. That's because it was the only civil court that could sustain such disputes
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
