Section 2 302 and Q 34 Qatim Alam, the actions taken by several individuals in the presentation of the joint intent, appreciating the evidence, the eye witnesses made contradictory statements at the time of the incident and at the time of the incident. When he hid himself to save his life, where the suspects opened fire. Police presence at the scene of the incident after the incident was not reported in the site plan where the witnesses were allegedly sitting at the scene where the witnesses were also concerned about the number of cartridges. I used to repeat each other. The firearms expert's recovery report revealed that the prosecution version had been fired from two different weapons, alleging that the use of Kalashnikov alone could not confirm any of the evidence on record. It cannot be believed that he has identified the co-accused standing behind the four legs. During the wall, he hid himself to save his life. In the house where the incident took place, none of the inmates were questioned and the police and the eyewitnesses were not residents of the house. Were not just witnesses of the occasion. The evidence of such witnesses had to be carefully dealt with; the trial court failed to consider material contradictions in the case of the prosecution which could not be made the basis of the conviction. And the accused was acquitted of the charges.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
