In light of the section 302 (b) and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the 35th murder conviction for a general reaction to murder, the lightweight patriarch admitted that the actual physical possession of the incident. The complaining party was not delivered, another prosecution witness has also admitted that the three accused were in some part of the land under consideration, while the rest of the accused's tenants were also present on that day. On the day of the incident, the complaining party did not really take over the entire suit area, especially the part of the land where the suspect was located at the time of the actual physical possession of the incident and the accused persons. Which led to violent and murderous attacks to oust them. As the matter was raised and he escaped the notice of the trial court and the High Court, it was unsafe for the four accused to die. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under sections 302 (b) and 149 PPC, but the death sentence was changed. The apex court directed that the sentence of life imprisonment be executed at the same time
