IMTIAZ AHMAD versus ADMINISTRATOR (RESIDUAL PROPERTIES)/ SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI
Section 15 (3) of the Withdrawal of Property and Homelessness Act (XIV of 1975) Act, Section 3 Population Powers in favor of Allotment of Urban Agricultural Land and Applicant in the Year 1963 64 And the Settlement Commissioner requesting the PTD to be issued, in 1981, canceling the applicant's allotment, accepting such application by the Settlement Commissioner to cancel the fake allotment of the same land in favor of the respondents. The suit was also seized by the applicant for not being entitled to the land because of the building site. The land against its legitimate claim and since then has been taken advantage of and since then the suit land was never available for allotment until the settlement rules were settled in 1975, and until then the matter was finalized. Was canceled and could not be reopened after it was canceled. Settlement laws in the year 1975, the Settlement Commissioner had no jurisdiction in 1981 to cancel the applicant's allotment, especially when neither land was available nor its legal status was disputed. Or the pending settlement commissioner before him had a fake allotment in favor of the respondents, and after declaring it a fake, the applicant's allotment remained in accordance with the strategy, according to the revenue records and special jurisdiction. The suit land was never the site of a building, but there was a Ghiromakan khota on one Khasra number, while the other Khasra number one wanted Ghiramantakan, while the rest of the land was usually on an agricultural land, while the Gheraonkine chap was an agricultural land. Identified
