Find a Lawyer

MST. MUMTAZ BIBI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 381/395 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Clerk or theft by servant and bandit bail, Grant of further investigation to the accused, designated accused in FIR No. 2 No Identification Parade was held to link FIR affiliates None of the items mentioned in the FIR were recovered from the accused persons. The story in the Complainant's supplementary statement contradicts the initial story in the FIR. , In the circumstances, further investigation will be required, in which case guarantees are guaranteed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• IMTIAZ AHMAD v. ADMINISTRATOR (RESIDUAL PROPERTIES)/ SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI 2011 PLD 342
• MUHAMMAD SAEED BACHA v. Late BADSHAH AMIR 2011 SCMR 345
• GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Agriculture and Livestock Department v. KHAN GINNERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2011 PLD 347
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. State 2011 PLD 350
• Syed SABIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 356
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE B, PESHAWAR v. ZABEEL PALACE HOTEL, PESHAWAR 2011 SCMR 361
• JAHANGIR SARWAR v. LAHORE HIGH COURT 2011 SCMR 363
• SHAHID ORAKAZI v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Law, Ministry of Law, Islamabad 2011 PLD 365

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

advocate for immigration from Kurram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes